The 20 English Premier League clubs suffered a total of 764 football injuries during the 2018/19 season—the most in the last eight years.
Marsh JLT Specialty’s Football Injury Index 2019 put the value of these injuries at a record £221 million, a 3% rise on the previous season.
The 2018 FIFA World Cup, player fatigue and shortening summer recovery times were all likely contributing factors, according to Marsh. Manchester United suffered the most injuries last season with 63, while Wolves experienced the fewest at 11.
Manchester City incurred the highest injury costs in 2018/19, spending £26.3 million on injured players.
The clubs most affected by injuries throughout the season were West Ham (2,003 total days out), Arsenal (1,771 days out) and Tottenham (1,652 days out).
These three clubs also topped the list for average unavailability of players each match day.
The rise in injury costs has largely been driven by the top six clubs, according to Marsh, which account for 54% of these costs.
The top six have experienced an average 48% increase in salaries paid to injured players since 2016, with Tottenham Hotspur particularly affected, seeing costs rise by 110% in the last three years.
Lennox Batten, managing director of special risks at Marsh JLT Specialty, commented: “As football’s popularity continues to rise, top level clubs have even more financial fire power and are using extra revenue to attract elite talent with higher wages in a highly competitive global marketplace.”
“The 2018/19 season saw record levels of injuries in the Premier League, notably driven by an abnormally high number of injuries in August and December as a likely consequence of the 2018 World Cup, and a relentless footballing calendar.”
“The fact that injury hit English clubs dominated European competitions last season illustrates just how elite clubs have the ability to continue competing through injury crises. However, with wages set to continue rising and the footballing calendar remaining as congested as ever, the cost of injuries—effectively the cost of doing business in the game—is likely to keep increasing in the long term.”